Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Is Colonial Williamsburg Really Haunted?

It's been quite some time since my last post and I thought I'd discuss a new subject in my blog. I've had an interest in the paranormal for quite some time. However, I had not actually taken action and done my own "hunting" until some friends and I took one of the Williamsburg ghost tours. This is the "original" ghost tour and features stories from L. B. Taylor's book Ghosts of Williamsburg. During this preliminary investigation, I took about 40 pictures at the various locations. Although I took some pictures during the tour, many of them were taken after the tour as it was still daylight during much of the tour.

Before you scroll down to the pictures below, I'd like to make a few things known.

1) I am a skeptic. So, I did not expect to see anything unusual in the pictures that I took.

2) I realize that props, reflective objects, etc. could possibly be used on such tours to make them "scary".

3) I can assure you that both my lens and the clear, protective filter were free of dust and condensation when the pictures were taken. I checked for condensation and such a few times that evening while taking the pictures.

4) I plan to do a test shoot at home. Why? If my camera captures something unusual there, it will have a great degree of authenticity. In addition, it will show that my camera is functioning properly when taking pictures at night; especially if nothing unusual is captured.

5) There were instances where I intentionally did not use the flash when taking pictures. Although the originals were quite dark, details were captured and I was able to bring out those details by adjusting the levels. A good analogy for "levels" are the 3 knobs that appear on many guitar amplifiers: Bass, Midtone, and Treble. In the case of "levels", it's more like: shadows, midtones, and highlights.

6) I also took a few photos using the camera's built-in infrared feature. Only one of those captured something interesting.

7) The only edits I made to these photos were resizing them for posting in the blog, adjusting the levels, and removing noise caused by low lighting conditions. I did not add anything to the photos that wasn't already there.

Now, the pictures . . . .



This is a picture of the Peyton Randolph house. I used the flash. It is said that the right-most upper 2 windows glow green. However, you can clearly see that the shades are down. Whereas, the shades are up in the other windows. The object of interest is in front of the lower portion of the bottom right window. It appears to be what paranormal investigators would call an "orb".

Below, is an enlarged image of that window.



The next image was taken less than a minute later from the same distance and angle. Again, I used the flash. The object of interest has apparently moved from the lower portion of the window to nearly above the top center pane of the window.



Again, an enlarged image of the window . . . .



Below is another picture of the Peyton Randolph house taken after the tour. I cannot even begin to explain the unusual objects in the image. I can assure you that the lens was free of dust and condensation. In addition, the 2 right hand windows on the first floor appear to have a green "glow". However, I double checked the story. It is definitely those 2 windows on the 2nd floor that supposedly glow. Weird.



An enlarged view of some of the more prominent objects . . . .



The picture below was taken less than one minute later from roughly the same distance, but I was standing more to the left of the house. Although there are fewer of the unexplainable objects, they are still there and appear to have moved.



Again, here is an enlarged view of the more prominent objects. Note that the lower window is still glowing green.



This infrared shot was taken about 8 minutes after the very first picture above and before the other 2 that show several unusual objects. Ignore the splotches in the upper left and right. They were caused by the IR light reflecting off of the clear filter. The object of interest is the bright spot near the bottom of the image on the right side. It appears to be just below the bottom center pane of that first floor window. As you can see from the pictures above, there is nothing in that area that would cause light (especially IR light) to reflect that brightly.



An enlarged view of that window. You can very faintly see some of the panes and the object in question below them.



This is a picture of the Wythe House taken after the tour. I didn't see anything in the image until I enhanced it by adjusting the levels. There appears to be an "orb" hovering over the grass between me (the camera man) and a friend.



This is another shot of the Wythe House taken 3 minutes before the picture above. Note the strange bright light just to the right of the house where the overhang meets the brick face. I can assure you that there was no airplane flying overhead at that time. Besides, it would have to have been quite close for the lights from it to be that bright.



The following shot was taken about 4 minutes after the shot above. It was taken from a similar distance and angle. Note that the strange bright light is not there.



Here's another shot of the Wythe House. Notice the "orb" floating above the fence on the right side of the house.



This next shot was taken less than one minute later from a similar distance and angle. Note that the "orb" is gone.



This next shot is possibly the weirdest of them all. It was a 2 second exposure and no flash. That's why you can see a little bit of motion blur. However, the thing to note is the "ribbon" of light streaking across at what I would estimate to be 2 feet above the ground. I can assure you that no-one was walking in front of me at the time. If that had been the case, you'd see the person as well as the object if it were attached to them.



Another shot taken less than one minute later from a similar distance and angle . . . no ribbon of light. Again, it was a 2 second exposure and no flash.



Here's a shot of the Wythe House before dark. Notice that the indoor shutters are open now whereas they are closed after dark. Take note of the upper left hand window. There is very little reflection in it and the window below it whereas there is a lot of reflection in some of the other windows. Now, look very closely at that upper left window. It could be a reflection, but I see what might be the collar of a light colored shirt and, perhaps, the chin of a figure in the second row of panes from the bottom and 3rd pane from the left. I also see what could be the cuff of a sleeve and a light colored object (perhaps a piece of paper) being held in a hand in the pane next to that.



Due to having to decrease the image size for posting in my blog, you're probably saying, "I don't see anything." So, I have cropped the original image to just that window and enlarged it slightly so you can see more detail. Still, I'll admit that I'm on the fence about this one. It could very well be some sort of reflection. Even so, it took a very interesting shape.



A lot of movies, cartoons, etc show strange stuff going on in cemetaries right? Well, I guess the cemetary behind Bruton Parish Church is no exception. I honestly wasn't expecting to capture anything because that was my thinking; strange stuff in cemetaries only happens in cartoons and movies. So much for thinking.

This first picture shows an unusual object up in a tree that looms over the grave stones. You might say, "oh, that's just a spider web or something." But wait until you see the next picture.



Don't say I didn't warn you! ;^) This shot was actually taken less than one minute before the one above. I guess the first shot scared a few of the object's "friends" away. It was taken from the same vantage point, but at a slightly different angle.



This final picture was taken further down the wall toward the back of the cemetary. Note the "orb" near the grave stone.



Despite the evidence in these images, I'm still not convinced that ghosts and other paranormal beings are real. Although I don't usually do a lot of outdoor night photography, I can assure you that my camera works well under indoor lighting and daylight conditions. I can also assure, as I already have, that the lens and clear filter were free of dust and condensation. I plan to do quite a bit more exploration on the topic. In fact, once I get on a roll, I'll dedicate a separate blog to the subject. I'll need to take a lot more photos at different sites as well as my home for a test site before I'll be anywhere near convinced. That said, I do plan to take another trip to Williamsburg soon. I'm going on a different ghost tour with a friend. We'll stick around afterward and take even more photos.

6 Write a comment!:

meshif said...

Your "orbs" probably are dust. While your lens and filter were clean, the atmosphere between you and your subjects wasn't. It looks like there is a gravel/dirt road/driveway at the location. A light breeze or even just walking on it is enough to kick up dust particles. When your flash or even ambient light bounces off these out-of-focus particles, you get orbs.

The ribbon of light probably was someone with a flashlight walking in front of your camera. You say that if it WAS a person with a flashlight, we should be able to see the person too. This is untrue. I do a lot of long exposure photography and a few times I have had this happen to me.

Take a look at photo 1 below. Looks pretty similar to your ribbon of light. I was on top of a storage room and told my friend to go down to the main floor and swing his light around. You can clearly see the light but it just seems to be floating there.

Photos 2 and 3 below are more 64 sec exposures without flash. The light spots in them were my friend holding his flashlight. He was in the frame long enough for my camera to capture the light coming off his flashlight but not his actual body.

Photo 4 below shows another example of funky long exposure shots. Again, this was a 64 sec exposure without flash. Notice how the camera looks transparent and even has little wisps of light coming off of it. This was actually caused by someone moving and replacing the security camera on me while shooting this photo.

I'm not gonna post any of my "orb" photos in this reply but if you look at my Flickr, you will see that I come across them a lot.

I'm not trying to tell you that ghosts don't exist. I actually agree with you about not really believing in them but still being open to the possibility that they might.

1 - http://www.uer.ca/locations/galpics/norm/306498.jpg

2 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/38363847@N05/4146196575/in/set-72157622780293825/

3 - http://www.uer.ca/locations/galpics/norm/308649.jpg

4 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/38363847@N05/4146198137/in/set-72157622780293825/

Fractalman237 said...

My photos vs your (meshif) photos:

In your first photo, most of the background, especially where the light swirls are, is quite dark. In contrast, the area behind the "ribbon of light" in my photo is not dark and clearly visible. Also, my exposure time was only 2 seconds and the "ribbon of light" does not travel across the entire field of view. Thus, a person would have appeared in the photo had someone been there.

In your second photo, the person is standing behind the flashlight. You've seen interrogations where a bright light is shined on the person being interrogated while the interrogator stands behind the light so he cannot be seen, right? You achieved a very similar effect in your photo. Also, if you are talking about the light behind the railing, that "flashlight" must have been a pin light to only appear that bright in a 64 second exposure. If you're referencing the other tiny specks of light in the photo, they're all in very dark places where it would be difficult to see the person behind the light.

In your third photo, the person not being visible can be attributed to your long exposure time. There's a big difference between a 2 second exposure and a 64 second exposure. I once took some 4 second exposures of a jazz band playing in a lounge. While most of the musicians appeared a bit fuzzy due to their movement, they were clearly visible in the photo.

I've done all sorts of experiments with my digital camera. I know what it's capable of and its limitations. I've even done longer exposures where I've focused on one subject for a few seconds and then spun around and focused on something else for a few seconds; thus, creating a sort of "double exposure". One day, I'll post some of those pics.

I have the same comment about your 4th photo as I did about your 3rd. With the very long exposure time, the person and the movement of the security camera appears as little more than a blur. Like I said, I've done lots of experiments with my digital camera. I know its capabilities and why things appear (or not appear) as they do (or don't) in longer exposures.

As for the "orbs" being dust, maybe. But then how to you explain single orbs in some of the photos and those in the cemetary where no-one had even walked through to kick up any dust? I'll agree that orbs aren't the most convincing when it comes to paranormal phenomena. That's why I hope to capture something truly amazing one day with more than one camera and from different vantage points so as to minimize the ideas of "oh, that's just a trick of light" or "those are just dust particles". I hope to capture something one day that will make people's jaws drop!

Lita said...

I went on a ghost tour recently and the Peyton Randolph house put on quite a light show for us. First the windows you captured were glowing with a greenish bluish light and the blinds were drawn (we could actually see there were blinds because the rest of the house windows were totally dark)but the two windows above your windows also glowed at the same time. There were four glowing windows total. Then in the far left upper window there was a white flash coming out of it... like a camera flash. Then directly below that window, the bottom left one, we saw what appeared to be a glowing white limb moving close to the window glass.
We were still at the house and while the guide was talking we heard a pounding noise coming from the inside. Then it stopped.
The last thing that happened was the bottom glowing window closest to the front door had its blinds going... opening and closing opening and closing so we could really see the glow behind it. The opening and closing went on for several minutes. Then the blinds shut and the weird light coming from behind it faded slowly away and the window became totally dark.
When we left the house, there were still three windows glowing.
I asked my friend who is an authorized daytime tourguide and she said the Peyton Randolph house is not equipped with many outlets... hardly any. The rooms also don't have flatscreen tvs or laptops so the light was genuine. The chances that they put on a high-production light just show to scare us is slim.

Lita said...

One more thing, the Wythe House did some weird shit too, like we heard the door knob try to open twice, and banging on the other side of the door. But nothing like the weird light show at the Peyton Randolph House.

Anonymous said...

Every exposer picture can show up differently, and just because you have a lighter background doesnt necessarily mean that someone would show up in a long time exposer.

Just saying that different cameras can have different outcomes is all

Fractalman237 said...

Yes, I realize this. I have owned my current camera since 2001. It's a Sony DSC-F707. I have spent countless hours experimenting with it. I've used all sorts of exposure times; up to 10+ seconds. I've also played around a lot with moving the camera during these longer exposures to see what effects the movement would have. I've created "double exposures" in this manner. I've used the whole gamut of custom white balance settings to create different effects. Believe me, I know my camera. It would have been quite apparent had there been a person carrying something in the 2 second exposure "ribbon of light" image. Though they'd appear very blurry, a person definitely would have shown up in that image had there been someone there. Thanks for the comment.